tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316462595382759732.post1350709233914696921..comments2023-10-10T08:19:01.114-07:00Comments on gas: musicalityCathyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06975598083153699764noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316462595382759732.post-13586240033656047702009-10-10T19:35:51.127-07:002009-10-10T19:35:51.127-07:00the other thing I wanted to add is that this notio...the other thing I wanted to add is that this notion of interiorization of musicality (aufhebung-ing of musicality?)is a way to connect lyric's privacy -- its "overheardness" or indirect, rather than direct, connection to audience -- with its other conventional attribute, musicality.<br /><br />Ascii-text: yes to picking up lutes -- I like singing -- I don't mean it so literally though -- I don't think I do. I mean something more like: the idea of literally performed musicality being interiorized/erased/transformed is a way to think about the relationship between song and lyric. But I don't mean for song to _precede_ lyric or to be its origin, and I don't mean that lyric should just get some music and then it will feel better about itself. It's not that lyric is lacking, more like lyric needs the category of song in order to be lyric and it's always been that way.<br /><br />I am procrastinating bad.Cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06975598083153699764noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6316462595382759732.post-81827033885048808252009-10-10T19:15:22.912-07:002009-10-10T19:15:22.912-07:00cathy this is really cool. i like the idea of sema...cathy this is really cool. i like the idea of semantic harmonies arising from a lack of actual ones. so lyric poets were/are trying to make up for this absence of sound? why don't they just pick up a lute?ashleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03771058189774308437noreply@blogger.com